Liechtenstein / EMIR
Liechtenstein, an EEA-member, will introduce EMIR (link to local regulation currently under discussion, available in German only) most likely by the beginning of 2016.
FinfraG - Hearing to the FMI Ordinance has started
Today, the Federal Department of Finance (FDF) initiated the hearing on the Financial Market Infrastructure Ordinance. The ordinance contains the Federal Council's implementing provisions for the Financial Market Infrastructure Act (FMIA). The hearing will continue until 2 October 2015.
The ordinance will come into force on January 1, 2016, reporting will quite likely not start before Q3 / 2016.
More information can be found here.
ESMA publishes review on OTC derivatives used by NFCs
ESMA has published a first report (no.1, August 13, 2015), a review on the use of OTC derivatives by non-financial counterparties.
For EMIR-addicts who cannot resist the temptation, we have made this document available here - honestly, it's good reading, but we don't think that you want to know in greater detail, how even the self-assessment of NFC+s (and vice versa) went obviously dramatically wrong.
However, the main findings and conclusions are:
1. ESMA confirms different interpretations of MIFID in different member states and therefore different interpretations of what is a derivative, especially referring to FX forwards. We think that this is an important part, because we find the result, that the majority of NFC-s uses interest rate derivatives (rather than FX) only, quite surprising. Our assumption: A lot of FX trades have not even been reported yet.
2. NFC-s have just an insignificant impact with regard to volumes (not numbers) of transactions. Who would have thought that? The only area where ESMA sees a significant systemic risk are commodities. We find this soothing, because it (in theory) means that FCs don't speculate with commodities more than NFCs use such instruments to manage their real, underlying exposures. On the other hand - can this really be true?
3. ESMA says, that the majority of NFC-s is not able to qualify their trades as hedges or not, because of the costs related to the respective analysis. (Yes, we also think that this is a good laugh, if it weren't that sad). We also find it interesting that ESMA has estimated the cost of being able to analyze your instruments whether they are hedges or not at EUR 50 K (one-off, they write on-off) and EUR 40 K / year recurring. Hm.
4. For those of you that have been reading until here, now comes the fun part: On the basis of this report and considering the interesting results, ESMA recommends to the EU commission to suspend the mandatory character of the field 'Directly linked to commercial activity or treasury financing' for NFCs and to allow NFCs to report all their trades as 'Not linked to commercial activity', because of the fact, that volumes are irrelevant anyway. This way, ESMA seriously believes to help reducing the costs of being compliant with the regulation.
Long story short - for the time being we don't see any relief for NFCs with regard to the reporting in general. What ESMA thinks could be a relief is, with all due respect, a joke.
Derivative Regulations / G20
We are currently working on a G20 overview with a special focus on the impact of derivative regulations on corporates.
The first results can be downloaded here (xlsm-format). In this overview which we will update regularly you will see, in which countries or regions derivative trades have to be reported by NFCs (non-financial counterparties).
From some countries we still have not sufficient information, others like Indonesia have not even started to enact a regulation at all.
For all countries for which we have already finished our analysis, we have put together a comprehensive documentation (regulations, implementation rules, comments, etc.). Should you be interested in these documents, please contact us directly.
If you want to be kept updated, sign up for our newsletter.
New tool in the tools section
Got a project? Cash flows in different currencies? Want to know forward rates? Calculate scenarios based on exchange rate shifts? Calculate the costs of hedging? Then you should check out our new, free tool: http://www.treamo.com/en/tools/free-tools.html
First Norwegian EMIRate client
We are excited to welcome Statkraft as first Norwegian EMIRate client.
EMIR & Level 2 validation rules
You report on your own? Then the so-called Level 2 validation rules, which will come into force as per November 1, 2015, will add some extra spice to your life. ESMA has instructed trade repositories not to accept any non-L2-compliant reports after November 1. And this time, this will be serious, after the first not so successful attempt with Level 1 validation rules.
It is never too late to eventually outsource this kind of burden. EMIRate-clients will of course be affected too, but they will not notice any changes. All changes will be - as usual - implemented in a way that does not affect at all the source data coming from various treasury management systems.
Two new EMIRate clients signed today.
We are glad to welcome two new EMIRate clients from Germany and Ireland.
Within 24 hours more than 100 downloads ...
of our FX rates tool.
The Good, The Bad and The (not so) Ugly
Excel & Treasury go well together. Check out our new tools corner and unleash the power of Excel. We have done it several times and our clients love the reports.
Challenging treasury reporting project
If the TMS vendor does not deliver what the client has asked for, which happens from time to time, we fix it. We are currently working for a client on risk management reports, based on exports from the TMS. And it works.
FinfraG / No reporting of trades between NFC-s
Game, set and match: Swiss National Council.
After intensive discussions during the past few days it had been finally decided that trades between NFC-s will not fall under the reporting obligation.
The only residual reporting obligation for Swiss corporates will concern trades concluded with Non-Swiss banks that will very likely not report under FinfraG.
EMIRate clients can be sure that we will offer a possibility to report the a.m. trades to a trade repository.
FinfraG / NFC Trades / Tie-Break?
It currently looks like we will see a tie-break decision. The Swiss Council of States does not plan to change the reporting obligation for NFC trades.
FinfraG & NFCs - Swiss ping pong?
After yesterday's decision of the Swiss National Council to - again - exclude trades between NFCs from the reporting obligation, the Swiss Council of States will discuss the matter again today. This will be interesting because summer is getting closer and a final decision should be taken soon and definitely before summer.